لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, it is also a nicely-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject to the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings to the evidence.

The criminal jail appeal is dismissed.appeal being time barred the appellant in his appeal has not challenged(Criminal Jail Appeal )

Typically, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (including These in crystal clear violation of founded case law) to your higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as case is just not appealed, the decision will stand.

It is currently well-settled that considerations for pre-arrest and post-arrest bail are thoroughly different, therefore, inside our view the figured out Judge had fallen in error to cancel the bail allowed to petitioner from the same Additional Sessions Judge.”

Section 302 with the PPC deals with one of the most major offenses in criminal regulation: murder. In this blog site post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, examine the punishment it involves, and review some notable case laws related to this particular section.

Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there might be a person or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason to the decision in the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could possibly be adopted in an argument.

The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge as it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders keeping in view that among the list of respondents has retired from service as pointed out with the counsel for the respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order regarding costs. Read more

The read more Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to make sure the Act's effective implementation in line with its authentic purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor diploma(s) in the topic of cooperative societies. Read more

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution may be justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears and a new system is place in its place.

Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses like self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which might end in reduced charges or acquittal.

She did note that the boy still needed substantial therapy in order to manage with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Risk-free with other children.” The boy was acquiring counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved from the actions.

13309-B of 2010 to be weak types of evidence and the evidentiary value whereof would be found in the time in the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Therefore, confirmed custody from the petitioner in jail is not going to provide any advantageous purpose at this stage.”

competent authority has determined the eligibility from the private respondents and found them to become in shape for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)